Frequency of multi drug resistant (MDR) Proteus species in clinical sample at tertiary care hospital.

Authors

  • Rakesh Kumar Maheshwari Author
  • Nirbhay Nirmal Author
  • Prachi Saban Author
  • Pragati Awasthi Author
  • Madhu Mali Author
  • Khushal Singh Beniwal Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62046/gijams.2026.v04i02.011

Keywords:

Multidrug resistance, Proteus mirabilis, Proteus vulgaris, antimicrobial resistance, tertiary care hospital

Abstract

Background: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Proteus species are becoming significant hospital-related pathogens linked to infections in wounds, the urinary tract, and the bloodstream. The rise of antimicrobialresistance restricts treatment choices and presents a significant clinical hurdle.Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed involving 37 unique MDR Proteus isolates collected from different clinical specimens. Species identification and antimicrobial resistance testingwere conducted using conventional microbiological techniques.Results: Out of 59 Proteus isolates 45 (76.6%) were Proteus mirabilis followed by 14 (23.7%) Proteus vulgaris. Out of 37 MDR of Proteus species isolates, Proteus mirabilis comprised 32 (86.5%) and Proteus vulgaris represented 5 (13.5%). Most cases were observed in patients older than 60 years (45.9%),with a higher prevalence in males (64.9%). Pus samples made up 56.8% of the isolates. Significant resistance was noted to cefepime (94.6%), ceftazidime (78.4%), and cefoperazone–sulbactam (70.3%). The resistance rate to piperacillin-tazobactam stood at 59.5%.Conclusion: P. mirabilis, are found leading factor to wound and systemic infections, exhibiting substantial resistance among the proteus species againstcephalosporins. Ongoing monitoring and proper use of antimicrobials are crucial for managing their dissemination.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Frequency of multi drug resistant (MDR) Proteus species in clinical sample at tertiary care hospital. (2026). Greenfort International Journal of Applied Medical Science, 4(2), 108-113. https://doi.org/10.62046/gijams.2026.v04i02.011